<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Setting Sights for a Sustainable Future</title>
	<link>http://blog.nau.com/2007/08/20/setting-sights-for-a-sustainable-future/</link>
	<description>dedicated to stirring the pot</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tyler Cheung</title>
		<link>http://blog.nau.com/2007/08/20/setting-sights-for-a-sustainable-future/#comment-26959</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.nau.com/2007/08/20/setting-sights-for-a-sustainable-future/#comment-26959</guid>
					<description>I agree that &quot;sustainability&quot; is one of those large umbrella catch phrases that can refer to the human population on so many levels.   I suppose we are used to thinking of it on ecological terms, i.e. trying to achieve some sort of thermodynamically stable/minimized entropy ecological model that is pleasing to us both aesthetically and morally.  So, it's interesting, and refreshing that Sightline has broadened the definition to include publich ealth/epidemiology, economic disparity and other trends besides the traditional ones we usually associate with the term.

I suppose at some point, you can argue that sustainability is in danger of becoming a non-political euphemism for progressivism/liberalism but in this day and age, we are sorely lacking in that department so it can only be a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that &#8220;sustainability&#8221; is one of those large umbrella catch phrases that can refer to the human population on so many levels.   I suppose we are used to thinking of it on ecological terms, i.e. trying to achieve some sort of thermodynamically stable/minimized entropy ecological model that is pleasing to us both aesthetically and morally.  So, it&#8217;s interesting, and refreshing that Sightline has broadened the definition to include publich ealth/epidemiology, economic disparity and other trends besides the traditional ones we usually associate with the term.</p>
<p>I suppose at some point, you can argue that sustainability is in danger of becoming a non-political euphemism for progressivism/liberalism but in this day and age, we are sorely lacking in that department so it can only be a good thing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
